AI and the Problems of Scale


Read the full details here.


In discussions about the implications of AI technology, there's often a tendency to draw parallels from classic detective stories, like Georges Simenon’s Inspector Maigret, who ingeniously intercepts a phone call. Reflecting on this story, we're reminded of the evolving scale and capabilities of surveillance, particularly in law enforcement. While traditional methods of surveillance, like 'Wanted' posters and license plate recognition cameras, have been widely accepted, the prospect of widespread face recognition raises important ethical and privacy concerns. The question arises: where do we draw the line between acceptable surveillance and intrusive monitoring, especially as technology enables unprecedented scale?


The advent of databases in the 1960s and 1970s posed similar ethical dilemmas. What was once theoretical at a small scale became practical at a massive one, prompting concerns about privacy and civil liberties. Today, with generative AI, we face a new frontier of scale-driven challenges. The ability to create convincing fake images and videos at an unprecedented scale raises questions about misinformation, identity theft, and privacy violations. What was once the domain of skilled manipulators is now accessible to anyone with a computer, fundamentally altering our understanding of authenticity and trust.


Yet, not all discomfort with technological advancements stems from genuine ethical concerns; some arise simply from novelty. As society grapples with new technologies, perceptions may evolve, sometimes leading to greater acceptance or heightened scrutiny. Events like the Cambridge Analytica scandal serve as catalysts for broader discussions about data privacy and misuse, shaping public perception and policy responses. However, challenges persist, including AI bias and the potential for catastrophic errors at scale, underscoring the importance of transparency and accountability in technological development.

Ultimately, navigating the ethical complexities of AI and automation requires a nuanced understanding of societal values, cultural norms, and political dynamics. What constitutes acceptable surveillance or permissible use of AI varies across different contexts and jurisdictions, defying easy solutions. As we confront these challenges, fostering dialogue and interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to ensuring that technological advancements align with ethical principles and respect individual rights.




  1. Ethical Considerations at Scale: Digital leaders must recognize that the scale of technological capabilities can fundamentally alter ethical considerations. As AI enables unprecedented surveillance and manipulation, it's crucial to evaluate the implications on privacy, civil liberties, and societal norms.
  2. Transparency and Accountability: Emphasize the importance of transparency and accountability in technological development. By openly addressing concerns such as AI bias and potential misuse, organizations can build trust and mitigate risks associated with automation.
  3. Cultural and Political Sensitivity: Acknowledge the diverse cultural and political landscapes in which technological innovations operate. What may be acceptable in one region could be contentious or prohibited in another. Understanding these nuances is essential for responsible deployment and regulatory compliance.